
- The Guide has been saved as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file and can be downloaded, read, and printed using Adobe Acrobat Reader software. If you don't already have a copy, this software is available for free at the Adobe web site.
- Download a copy of the software by clicking on this
icon.
- Once you have installed the software on your computer, click on this
icon to download the Guide.
Too often, scholars returning from photographic documentation research in the field proclaim the following upon their return: "Where is this picture from?", "I can't believe I didn't take a detail of this," "Is that an inscription on the base of the shrine wall!", or some similar exclamation of distress. This may not be the case for scholars who do not rely heavily on visual materials for their research, but for those who do, these comments are all too often appropo. I have seen even the most experienced photographers/scholars sigh in dismay over lost, forgotten, or blurred photographs.
This web page provides a brief set of guidelines for undertaking photographic documentation in the field. It is intended to assist the novice art historian with field research, but portions of it might prove useful for scholars in other fields who work with visual resources. In essence, it provides guidelines that will help scholars forgo the stages of trial and error that too often lead to problems, unwanted surprises, and disappointing or costly mistakes. Seasoned veterans who are looking for new ways to make their research more effective, productive, and usable to future generations might also find the Guide useful.
Like many guides, this page contains "hints and tips" and "dos and don'ts" that will, hopefully, save scholars time, money, and effort, while simultaneously providing rigorous standards. Although this guide has its roots in field research experience in Asia, many of the systems and processes can be applied to photographic documentation in other research areas.
This Guide to Photographic Documentation also addresses the growing need for research and photo documentation standards. To date, no standard for photographic documentation in the field has been established. However, advances in digital technology have not only opened the doors to a greater sharing of information, but have underscored the need for scholars to adhere to documentation standards, thereby ensuring the preservation of scholarly knowledge in usable formats. The need for standardization is particularly relevant in the discipline of Asian Art History, where, often, no formal photographic record of an object exists beyond an individual scholar's photographic collection. If scholars of Asian art can ever hope to benefit from the documentation work of their predecessors and future generations, some type of standard should be adopted.
While I do not propose that this guide represent a formal "standard" for photographic documentation, I hope it will raise the question of needed documentation guidelines in the History of Art community. Please send Comments and Suggestions that can be included in this Guide.
Without the benefit of John C. and Susan L. Huntington's years of field experience, this Guide could not have been created. The standards outlined here reflect both John's training as a professional photographer and Susan's detailed documentation methodology. Their creative initiative, diligence, and willingness to share their approach are the foundation of this Guide. Any innovations or new insights that may appear in this text stem directly from my experience working as a member of their field research teams and using their field notes and photographs over the past six years to help continue the development of The Huntington Archive at The Ohio State University. Most, if not all, of the information dealing with cameras and photography was transmitted to me by John Huntington. Any errors found in this guide regarding photography are mine, not his. Also, my deepest thanks to T. Matthew Ciolek, Web Master and information specialist extraordinaire, for suggesting that I write this guide as a Web-accessible document. I hope it meets his expectations.
The "field" is any place that scholars go to research and collect information. It can imply travel over great distances or a short trip to a nearby location. The field consists of everything from a museum, to a temple in the center of a bustling metropolis, to a deserted archaeological site. Regardless of the location or field "type," the preparation for and the philosophical approach to documentation of art, architecture, ritual, and texts is, essentially, the same.
Photographic Documentation
Simply put, photographic documentation is the precise recording of, among
other things, art, text, architecture, ritual, or a physical location. At
its least, it provides a visual record acknowledging the existence of an
object or place at a particular moment in time. At its best, it provides
a thorough visual document of an object or place, both recording its existence
and allowing for serious scholarly research through photographic means.
Photographic documentation, then, provides a "complete" record
of an object or place--a record that will prove useful to future researchers.
Why should one undertake photographic documentation?
If art is "text" or understood to contain information, then one can look at photographic documentation as a recording of this information at a fixed moment in time. When researching a text, perhaps nothing is more frustrating than discovering a missing page or not being able to read a poorly scripted ligature. Researching an object or place is no different in this respect. One might have an overall picture of a structure and, perhaps, even several details, but without thorough documentation, sections of the "text" are missing or details are unreadable. Therefore, complete documentation of a site is essential if one can ever hope to "read" a work of art.
It should be noted that there is a difference between a "beautiful" photograph and photographs that document an object or place. A "beautiful" photograph of a Shiva Nataraja (a dancing form of the god Shiva) image might show a side view that off-sets the face and omits portions of the ring of fire around the deity. Such a photograph might demonstrate exceptional composition and framing that caputres a "sense" of the image. However, does not provide the documentation necessary for a detailed study of the image. It records the work of art's existence, but provides little else in terms of information.
Standardized photographic documentation of this same work might include: overviews of the front, sides, back, and bottom of the sculpture; details of the top, middle, and lower section of the front of the image; details of all attributes and stylistic elements; and, when present, details of inscriptional evidence. This combination of photographs would allow the scholar to examine all portions of the image, as well as to identify the location of the details.
Tips to keep in mind are indicated in red.
Architecture: Photographing from the outside to the inside.
Museums:
*When arriving at a site, stop, relax, and take a minute to think about your plan. Nothing is more disorganizing than rushing to photograph those items you know you want to document and then trying to retrace steps in order to fill in the gaps.*
*Taking detailed notes in the field notebooks will not only help you research and collect information more quickly, but will prove invaluable for future scholars in identifying the items documented in a given picture.*
*When in doubt, use a tripod!*
*If you are working alone, don't be afraid to ask for assistance from people living and/or working at the site (CK).*
*Make sure all of your camera equipment, tripods, notebooks, shoes, other personal items, and team research members are not in the picture. While it may be nice to include team members in some photographs, it can be very distracting when they continually appear in the photographs.*
*If there is an image, photograph it. If there is a blank wall, photograph it. If there is an empty niche with nothing in it, photograph it.*
*Include sketches and ground plans of the structure and its details. This can take only a few minutes, but can save you a tremendous amount of time later."*
*If available, take numerous photocopies of site ground plans. When taking overviews, one can label the roll number at the top of the plan, then mark the angle and position from which the photograph was taken, indicating the corresponding frame (CK).*
*For relief panels, it may be helpful to take several photographs using different lenses (30-70mm and 80-200; CK).*
*Fill the frame with the item you are documenting. Excessive space around the image represents lost information that could have been seen in a more tightly framed picture.*
*Never say, "I'll remember this," or "I'll understand what I meant by this squiggly line."*
*Always be sure to locate details by taking additional overviews, particularly if you know that an item may not be visible in your general overviews. In your notes, you can include a reference to the fact that the photograph was taken in order to locate "such and such" detail.*
*Despite the need to be systematic, try not to be too rigid. In other words, if you are in the middle of photographing the interior of a temple space where singers and dancers perform, and the person in charge of the temple offers to let you photograph in the shrine interior, don't wait!*
*When you start to feel tempted to skip steps, stop, take a break, and eat something. If you continue in this frame of mind, the likelihood of missed pictures increases dramatically. The minute you hear yourself or a team member say, "I'll understand what I meant by this," that's a sure indication that a break is needed.*
*Remember, it takes about an hour to get into the rhythm of this type of work. Give yourself time to adjust to the detailed nature of the work before deciding it isn't worth the effort.*
*Number rolls of film consecutively, even on subsequent trips. The roll number can also include the date the trip was taken.*
*Indicate both direction in absolute and relative terms (i.e. "window" to the north (left) of the main shrine door).*
*If something is written incorrectly during the documenation process, do not obliterate the "incorrect" measurement or iconographic identification. Instead, draw a single line through the text and write the correct information beside it. Ocassionally, this "incorrect" information actually resulted from an intuitive response and might prove to contain valuable information at a later date. Once the data has been marked-out, it can never be recovered.*
Ciolek, T. Matthew (TMC), tmciolek@coombs.anu.edu.au
Huntington, John C. (JCH), huntington.2@osu.edu
Karnitis, Catherine (CK)
This WWW server is provided by The Huntington Archive of Buddhist and Related Arts, College of the Arts, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
URL http://kaladarshan.arts.ohio-state.edu/photodoc/photodoc.html
This Web page incorporates Dublin Core Metadata. ![]()
This Web page may be linked to any other Web pages; permission is not required. The contents, however, may not be altered. Note that the information contained within all Huntington Archive Server pages is under copyright. Unauthorized use or electronic dissemination is prohibited by applicable laws. Please contact the maintainer for permission to re-publish any material.